I
thought the short discussion we had on hateful speech in class was the most
interesting. I have always disliked hateful speech because of the rifts it can
cause in society. I came across a couple articles online that I found
interesting. The washingtonpost.com wrote a story on the Westboro Baptist
church and their protests against military funerals.
The
article reads that we as Americans tend to “wish for less of something that the
First Amendment protects. Less hateful speech. One noisy protest group.” (Gene
Policinski). One particular noisy protest group that has become a house hold
name is the Westboro Baptist church. Their anti gay speech and military funeral
protests have sparked controversy across the nation. The first amendment protects
their “hateful speech” as the Supreme Court ruled. Robert Barnes a Washington
Post Staff writes
“Chief
Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote that the Westboro Baptist Church’s picketing
at fallen soldiers’ funerals ‘is certainly hurtful and its contribution to
public discourse may be negligible.’ But he said the reaction may not be
‘punishing the speaker’. As a nation we have chosen a different course – to
protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle
public debate.”
So even though their
speech is hurtful and some Americans probably wish that they could be stopped,
the ruling shows that the Westboro church is able and free to continue their
“hateful speech”. While their type of speech is not smiled upon, if we as a
country limited their speech because we do not like it; who else’s speech would
we be able to silence just because we do not like it?
Gene Policinski of FirstAmendmentCenter.org writes
after the Boston Marathon Bombing “the
just – released 2013 State of the First Amendment Survey by the First Amendment
Center gives us reason to worry about the future because of a repeating threat
to our core freedoms: fear.” The report showed that “In this year’s survey,
conducted in May – about a month after the Boston Marathon bombing – 34% of
Americans said the first Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees, up
to 21 points from the 13% recorded in the 2012 survey.”
As in the example with the Westboro Baptist church we can
not alter the first amendment to suit our needs for whatever circumstance we
are facing. If America changes this Amendment every time there is a crisis, who
is to say it will ever go back to normal? In the words Benjamin Franklin “They
who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve
neither liberty nor safety.”
No comments:
Post a Comment