In Nuevo Laredo, Texas, Mexican drug cartel kidnappings are
preventing one of the largest Spanish newspapers on the border from publishing information
freely. The newspaper, El Mañana, developed a self-censorship policy after
several attacks made reporters and the public no longer safe. El Mañana
resisted the censorship policy for a long time, remaining undeterred even after
the cartel murdered their editor, shot up their office, and attacked with
homemade grenades twice. Soon after, however, something had to change and the
newspaper began self-censoring their stories—no longer including bylines and
omitting details as well as names and pictures of people being quoted. The censorship
has changed the newspaper and disheartened the reporters and public, who officially
feel the threat of the cartel on their freedom of expression.
This one instance highlights an issue that happens
worldwide, every day. Fear of a higher power constantly puts an invisible
filter on people’s speech and expression. No one can obviously blame El Mañana
for instating their self-censorship policy, but in doing so they also
relinquished a small amount of power to the cartel. Although they still publish
stories on cartel violence from larger Mexican newspapers, they are no longer
able to really tell their public what is happening—which is a right and
obligation that all newspapers and journalists have.
On a smaller scale, college newspapers can feel this
imposing power on their speech as well. Unlike high school newspapers, college
newspapers enjoy First Amendment rights and cannot be censored. This, however,
does not mean that they don’t still feel the pressure of censorship. School authorities frequently attempt to impose censorship
on college newspapers—especially when it comes to controversial material that
could reflect poorly on the school. Threats to revoke funding or inflict other
such consequences upon the newspaper sometimes ensure that writers are kept in
line and that they don’t feel too much
freedom of expression.
Working for the University News, I have already witnessed
such hesitation from writers on a small level, and it makes me concerned that
news everywhere has a slight veil of censorship. If our journalists and our
news sources don’t give us the full, detailed truth, then how do we know what
we’re missing? We might legally have a freedom of expression, but imposed fear
can keep us from exercising this right.
This article brings up freedom of speech in a new light I had never thought of before. Like you mentioned, of course no one can blame El Mañana for instating their self-censorship policy. This is an extreme example of how imposed fear can keep us from exercising our right to speak freely, and it’s sad that many journalists and employees had to lose their lives just to do their job; informing the public about what is going on. On one hand, they are protecting their own lives by censoring the newspaper, but on the other hand, by not being able to inform the public of any threats they should be aware of and by not disclosing important information, they are putting the lives of the public at risk. It is a tough situation they have been put in.
ReplyDeleteAs far as the college newspaper example goes, I also see a little bit of that here as well. I know that SLU is supposed to disclose any crime incidents to the police, but more often than not they don’t. SLU has a reputation to keep and by not publicizing every incident, they are doing so. Although this might be a minor example compared to the El Mañana, it still does a good job of showing the struggle between imposed fear and freedom of speech. Good article.